Monday, April 15, 2019
Advantages of Group Decision-Making Essay Example for Free
Advantages of Group Decision-Making raiseFirstly, meeting decision making from experts in different aras is beneficial to solve complicate problems. For instance, in a small corporation, boss often makes suggestions by himself the result of his behavior relies on the ability of the boss. So in that respect are cases when he kittyt make things right, which may be serious fault to the act of a company. However, people with different backgrounds consider the problems more carefully and comprehensively, as a result, running the company will be in less risk. Secondly, people making decisions in classs are eager to jut more risks individually. Decisions come with risks.People who make the wrong decision will take the responsibility. A contradiction in terms rises up when they attempt to avoid being wrong and at the same time, solve problems correctly. As a result, people will somewhat not dare to make the final decision. Nevertheless, group decision makers can share the risks because each of them has responsibility for the suggestions to the problem. Moreover, individual risks are decreased when some others rectify the suggestion for him or her. 2.Disadvantages of group decision-makingFirstly, low efficiency in decision-making, everyone has his own opinions and under certain circumstances such as brainstorming, it costs more time to decide what to do by group decision-making than by personal decision-making. If things go well, the results will come egress quickly. But if each of them in a group cant comprise in the end, nothing will be achieved. For example, there is news from CCTV about the 2012 DOHA mood Change Conference, Nearly 200 countries haggling over how to stop climate change and how to pay for it failed to tinct a deal on schedule Friday. That sets the stage for the wrangling to continue late into the night.Things like these are usually occurred when a large number of people attend. Finally, the conference extended until they arrive at an agreement. Secondly, group decision-making will lose effectiveness when people are not likely to put up with suggestions out of some reasons. In such cases, the leader of the group will be the only one who does decision-making, which has no diffidence with personal decision-making. All the members of the group should have equal opportunities and are willing to speak out. Then, group decision-making functions better in dealing with problems.